Report of the Special Examination of Fannie Mae (PDF)
Summary of the Report
• Fannie Mae senior management promoted an image of the Enterprise as one of the lowest-risk financial
institutions in the world and as “best in class” in terms of risk management, financial reporting, internal
control, and corporate governance. The findings in this report show that risks at Fannie Mae were greatly
understated and that the image was false.
• During the period covered by this report—1998 to mid-2004—Fannie Mae reported extremely smooth
profit growth and hit announced targets for earnings per share precisely each quarter. Those achievements
were illusions deliberately and systematically created by the Enterprise’s senior management with the aid
of inappropriate accounting and improper earnings management.
• A large number of Fannie Mae’s accounting policies and practices did not comply with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The Enterprise also had serious problems of internal control,
financial reporting, and corporate governance. Those errors resulted in Fannie Mae overstating reported
income and capital by a currently estimated $10.6 billion.
• By deliberately and intentionally manipulating accounting to hit earnings targets, senior management
maximized the bonuses and other executive compensation they received, at the expense of shareholders.
Earnings management made a significant contribution to the compensation of Fannie Mae Chairman and
CEO Franklin Raines, which totaled over $90 million from 1998 through 2003. Of that total, over $52
million was directly tied to achieving earnings per share targets.
• Fannie Mae consistently took a significant amount of interest rate risk and, when interest rates fell in 2002,
incurred billions of dollars in economic losses. The Enterprise also had large operational and reputational
risk exposures.
• Fannie Mae’s Board of Directors contributed to those problems by failing to be sufficiently informed and
to act independently of its chairman, Franklin Raines, and other senior executives; by failing to exercise
the requisite oversight over the Enterprise’s operations; and by failing to discover or ensure the correction
of a wide variety of unsafe and unsound practices.
• The Board’s failures continued in the wake of revelations of accounting problems and improper earnings
management at Freddie Mac and other high profile firms, the initiation of OFHEO’s special examination,
and credible allegations of improper earnings management made by an employee of the Enterprise’s
Office of the Controller.
• Senior management did not make investments in accounting systems, computer systems, other
infrastructure, and staffing needed to support a sound internal control system, proper accounting, and
GAAP-consistent financial reporting. Those failures came at a time when Fannie Mae faced many
operational challenges related to its rapid growth and changing accounting and legal requirements.
• Fannie Mae senior management sought to interfere with OFHEO’s special examination by directing the
Enterprise’s lobbyists to use their ties to Congressional staff to 1) generate a Congressional request for the
Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to investigate OFHEO’s
conduct of that examination and 2) insert into an appropriations bill language that would reduce the
agency’s appropriations until the Director of OFHEO was replaced.
• OFHEO has directed and will continue to direct Fannie Mae to take remedial actions to enhance the safe
and sound operation of the Enterprise going forward. OFHEO staff recommends actions to enhance the
goal of maintaining the safety and soundness of Fannie Mae.